Spending a few thousand dollars on software every few years is anticipated, and minimal given the fact that a single job might pay for the purchase.
#GIMPSHOP RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL#
But for established professional design firms, the price of Photoshop and the entire Creative Suite represents an investment with an expected return. M inimal investment – For the startup or hobbyist, the price of Photoshop might be a barrier to entry.
Mistrust of open source – Perception that open source is always distributed with spyware or susceptible to crashes and data loss can turn some users off, whether the perception is valid or not. Lack of GIMP support and tutorials – There are tutorials and excellent forums for GIMP users, yes, but not near the volume you'll find for Photoshop users, including professional Adobe support. Photoshop integrates with other Adobe products – From Acrobat to Illustrator, InDesign to Dreamweaver, Photoshop integrates seamlessly with other Adobe Creative Suite products. The lesson here is that Adobe made it difficult to use their software for legitimate. But I was able to find a way to bypass Photoshops prevention efforts. This was a huge pain in my ass when I was trying to make an ad in the form of an imitation twenty dollar bill for a client. It's what's expected of professional firms. TIL that Photoshop wont let you open a scanned image of currency. Photoshop is the industry standard – Photoshop is the most established photo editing software in the professional world. Una propaggine, Gimpshop, presenta uninterfaccia utente che riproduce laspetto e la terminologia di Photoshop ed è anche gratuita.
You learned on Photoshop – Most design classes use Photoshop once out of school, why learn a lesser-known software that does the same thing?Īdvanced features – GIMP can do more than most hobbyists would ever need, but Photoshop can still do more. GIMP è un software di fotoritocco gratuito spesso citato come il miglior software di editing di immagini open source sul pianeta. Marketing – Adobe undoubtedly has a large marketing budget, which they put to good use. What I do wonder is, when the free GIMP is arguably every bit as powerful as the $700 Photoshop, why doesn't everyone just use GIMP? What's more, I have no problem whatsoever with open source – I'm also an enthusiast and have promoted GIMP in dozens of posts. Why doesn't everyone use it instead?įirst, I make no argument against GIMP as a world-class image editor. An offshoot, Gimpshop, features a user interface that mimics the appearance and terminology of Photoshop – and it's also free. GIMP is a free photo editing software often cited as the best open source image editing software on the planet. If GIMP is so good, why does everyone use Photoshop? It's a fair question, given the fact that GIMP is so often heralded by open source enthusiasts.
0 kommentar(er)
